Click to return to iNEWS ARCHIVES page
Week of August 15, 2008 • Issue No. 013
This Week in the iNews:
▲ LUNCH & LEARN SERIES – MICHIGAN BUSINESS TAX
▲ FAILED TAX SHELTER STRATEGY
▲ FOCUS ON FRAUD: 2008 REPORT TO THE NATION ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE, ACFE
▲ First Lunch & Learn Series – Thursday, August 21, 2008
Michigan Business Tax – Presented by Tom Jeakle
Please join us for the first Series of our Lunch and Learn program at noon on Thursday, August 21, 2008 in the Prangley Marks, LLP lunch/conference room.
Topics to be discussed:
· The Michigan Business Tax (MBT) that applies to all business activity occurring after December 31, 2007.
· MBT is a combination business income tax and modified gross receipts tax with a significant number of credits.
· Several new credits reward Michigan employment and investments.
This "Lunch and Learn" will cover both parts of the tax as well as all the credits and the small business credit provisions.
Nexus, apportionment and unitary filing provisions designed to extend the reach of the tax beyond Michigan boarders will also be discussed.
Please contact Michelle Ripley at mripley@pmcpa.com or at (616) 774-9004 for your reservation by Tuesday August 19th.
Seating is limited. Don’t miss out!
▲ Failed Tax Shelter Strategy - Transactions to Inflate Basis of Corporate Stock Using Foreign Currency Options Lacked Economic Substance (Stobie Creek Investments, LLC, FedCl)
This recent court case is a reminder that not all tax savings strategies actually work. Even though promoted by a law firm, and technically correct, it failed because it lacked economic substance.
A series of transactions entered into to increase the basis of family-owned corporate stock and reduce the capital gain upon the stock’s sale, while in compliance with the literal terms of the tax code, lacked economic substance. The transactions (a “Son of BOSS”-type tax shelter), were undertaken pursuant to a tax strategy that was promoted by a law firm and referred to as Basis Enhancing Derivatives Structures (“BEDS”).
In the transactions, the family members established separate single-member LLCs, each of which entered into Foreign Exchange Digital Options Transactions (FXDOTs), whereby they simultaneously purchased foreign currency digital long options and sold foreign currency digital short options involving the dollar/euro and the Swiss franc/dollar. Long option premiums paid were netted against the short option premiums to be paid by a bank, resulting in a net premium to be paid by each LLC.
The court examined the FXDOT transactions and the court found that, from an objective viewpoint, the FXDOT transactions lacked economic reality and were not motivated by a business purpose.
Substantial penalties were imposed as a consequence of the transactions being disregarded for tax purposes.
Please talk to us first, before you get involved in any similar transaction that appears to be too good to be true.
▲FOCUS ON FRAUD: 2008 REPORT TO THE NATION ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE, ACFE, Part 3
This study is based on data compiled from 959 cases of occupational fraud that were investigated between January 2006 and February 2008. All information was provided by the Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs) who investigated those cases.
Executive Summary – Part 3
Next time:
Executive Summary – Part 4 The Perpetrators